March 13, 2015

Watch how FF7 dropped real cars out of a plane

"We're freefalling at 130 or 140mph... these cars have a mind of their own, they're doing whatever they feel like." So says Luke Aikins, an aerial camera flyer on Fast & Furious 7.

He's one of five camera guys who jumped out of a plane to film actual cars - well, shells - being rolled out of a C-130 cargo plane. Yep, that stunt was real.

In this newly released behind-the-scenes clip from the upcoming Fast & Furious 7 movie, we see how the film makers used an actual cargo plane, actual cars, a helicopter to capture it and some men with cameras freefalling, to capture a rather audacious stunt. That's a lot of metal and flesh in the air, falling together. Wowser.

Have a watch of the clip above, and stay tuned - we'll have much, much more from the new FF7 film coming soon. From a simple drag race in a bright orange Supra, to throwing real cars out of a cargo plane - whatever will they think of next?

post from sitemap

March 12, 2015

You have to buy this midget racer

Here is a classic American racing car from the late 1940s, once owned by an American Racing Driver's Club ‘Hall of Famer', since fully restored and up for auction.

It's also really quite excellent. Internet, meet the Kurtis Kraft Midget Racer. We suspect you will immediately need this in your life.

Built in 1948 and originally raced by Ed Bowman, it was subsequently bought by Bobby Albert - the ARDC Hall of Famer - in the late 1970s, who restored it in the shape of the ‘Bulldog Ofy' that Albert drove.

It was purchased from Albert's estate in 2007, and again treated to another full restoration, part of which includes a fully rebuilt 1.6-litre CC Ofenhauser four-pot racing engine with Hilborn fuel injection and around 100bhp.

The Kurtis Kraft will be offered up for auction at Gooding & Co's Amelia Island sale that kicks off tomorrow (13 March) in the States. It's the same auction that will host the sale of the similarly excellent Porsche 911 GT2 we showed you a couple of weeks ago, as well as a number of other cool classics.

Oh, the estimated price of this midget-sized excellence? Between £30k and £43k ($45k-$65k).

Is this the most fun you can have with 8bhp? TG drives two pocket classics

Pics via Gooding & Co

post from sitemap

First drive: Morgan Plus 8 Speedster

  • Next steps

    Book a test drive

    Order a brochure

    Powered by motoring.co.uk

Wait: that's a new Morgan?

We'll grant you this appears to be a Morgan from the Malvern company's old school. And next to the fancy new Aero 8, it perhaps looks a generation or two older. But the beauty is in the detail.

See, those archaically styled panels sit atop similar underpinnings to that new car. Morgan's more sophisticated aluminium chassis eschews the need for tree-felling, while a BMW-sourced 4.8-litre V8 engine provides more than ample power to the rear wheels.

How much, exactly?


367bhp. Which in light of the new Audi RS3 and Ford Focus RS, probably doesn't sound a vast amount for a sports car asking of £69,995 before some irresistible bespoke optioning.

But then look closely and assess what you can't see; a windscreen and roof are conspicuous by their absence, as is much beyond heated leather seats in the way of creature comforts. This Plus 8 Speedster is Morgan going all GT3 RS on us, and as a result, this is a V8-powered sports car weighing around 1100kg. That's near Cayman GT4 power in something the weight of a Fiesta.

And try 0-62mph in 4.2 seconds without a windscreen and you'll deem it fast enough. Especially with not a single bit of electric jiggery pokery between its 367 horses and the rear tyres, which on our test car, were some very track-biased Yokohamas. It's the kind of recipe we've not really seen since the heyday of TVR.

Weren't TVRs a bit, er, animalistic to drive?

They certainly were. And unsurprisingly, this Speedster will indulge informed bravery or punish clumsy stupidity in a similarly stark manner.

But there's a far friendlier edge to it. Start getting too greedy with the throttle pedal - and in the light wintry conditions we were ‘blessed' with, that could include fourth-gear half-throttle in a straight line - and you'll receive progressive warning signs from the rear axle. With über-crisp throttle response and feelsome steering, accurate reactions to this are easy.

And with nothing between your ears and the car's key sounds but air, your awareness of its behaviour changes are heightened. You'll also revel in rifling up and down its six gears, the engine's cacophony of pops and crackles supremely addictive and the manual shift (ignore the optional auto, we implore you) providing genuine physical pleasure to your lower arm.

Wow.

Yep. The satisfaction lies in the mechanicals. Based on Morgan's newer chassis, this is a good thing to drive, even if the wheels are somewhat short of travel over bumpy roads. It can't trickle down a challenging road with the ease of an Elise, but then an Elise doesn't have a drivetrain as supreme as this. Pick any gear at just about any speed and this V8 just oozes torque, happy to rev to its limits or easy as pie to stroke effortlessly along. Spec the £1400 side-exit exhausts (you must) and it's one of the finest exemplars of eight-cylinder soundtracks on sale.

There's a cruise control system fitted, and while it may appear completely superfluous in a luxury-stripped Morgan, it becomes rather handy for keeping things sane on the motorway.

The motorway? Surely this is just a B-road and trackday sort of car?

It is, but it's a perfectly comfortable way to travel between those places. So long as you prepare. We survived sub-zero commuting in it, but it required clever use of layers and studious use of a helmet. Suitably wrapped and snuggled in, though, it's a genuinely cosy place to be. And you'll bring ceaseless amusement to those in the cars around you.

£70,000 is a lot.


It certainly is. It's a Cayman GT4 with a few tasty options. Or a used Lamborghini Gallardo. But then neither of those will be anywhere near as beguiling as the Speedster. And neither will win you as many admiring glances or off-the-cuff petrol forecourt conversations.

There are few cars as raucous and anti-socially vocal that we've attracted not a single negative reaction in. And it provides as much, if not more joy for those sat inside. It may be Morgan's silliest car, but it's arguably its best.

post from sitemap

March 11, 2015

Meet the C63 AMG’s granddaddy

Funny to think they called this the ‘Baby Benz'. A cursory glance at that rear spoiler is enough to realise this Benz isn't one suitable for children; it's the 190 E 2.5 Evolution II, and it's 25 years old.

Unveiled at the 1990 Geneva Motor Show, this was the most extreme example of the W201 Mercedes, the base model of which was launched as far back as 1982 and given that cuddly nickname to represent its position in the Mercedes hierarchy (yes, it was the smallest one they built back then).

Just two years after this base model launched, the 190 E 2.3-16 arrived on the scene, with 185bhp and motorsport genes. When the new Nürburgring opened in 1984, Mercedes fielded 20 identical 190 E 2.3s for a 12-lap, christening race.

People like Jack Brabham, John Surtees, Alan Jones, James Hunt, Nikia Lauda, Alain Prost and Keke Rosberg all lined up on the grid. And Ayrton Senna. Who, after a tight race, whupped them all.

Top Gear drives Senna's old Merc

So, Mercedes entered the DTM in 1988 with the 190, but it wasn't until 1990 that we saw this Evolution II, a development of the 2.5-litre Evo, itself an evolution of the 2.3-litre 190. Power in the Evo II now sat at 235bhp, while 0-62mph was achieved in 7.1 seconds. It'd top out at 155mph, too.

Just 502 versions of this car were made (to let it go racing in the DTM), and featured a race-tuned chassis, 17in wheels, new front and rear bumpers, flared arches and that lovely rear wing.

It gets better, too. The Evo IIs converted by AMG for the DTM featured ‘robust' plastic bonnets, boot lids and spoilers. Oh, and 373bhp from their 2.5-litre engines. Nice.

post from sitemap

March 10, 2015

First drive: Porsche Cayman GT4

  • Next steps

    Book a test drive

    Order a brochure

    Powered by motoring.co.uk

Out with it, is the Cayman GT4 fit to stand shoulder to shoulder with the 911 GT3?

Absolutely. It's a humdinger of a car, mighty on track, addictive on the road and capable of making your fizzy bits fizz like you've dropped an Alka Seltzer into your pants. It's... proper.

What, better than a GT3?

Wrong question. Different, but a genuine Porsche GT product right down to the sole of its Michelins. By which I mean it's got a definite track focus - this is not a benignly upgraded Cayman with soothing road manners. The ride is decidedly firm, road noise a bit more intrusive, compromises have been made. But this is reassuring, it shows Porsche has approached the Cayman with the right mindset.

Oh, and let's clear something else up right now - the reason we haven't had this car before is not because of internal wranglings about overlap with the 911, it's because the GT division hasn't had the manpower and resources to be able to do it.

So will there ultimately be a GT4 RS, then?

Very unlikely, I'm afraid. But there's plenty here to keep you occupied for the time being. The 3.8-litre flat six is borrowed from the Carrera S, but turned through 180 degrees so the motor sits amidships with the gearbox trailing behind. There are a few tweaks, but power and torque remain the same at 380bhp and 310lb ft. Despite the extra capacity over the 3.4-litre Caymans, this engine is only about 7kg heavier, and yes, your only choice is a six-speed manual gearbox. No PDK on the options list here.

What about the suspension?

Largely borrowed from the 911 GT3, which means you can adjust the front and rear set-ups if you can be bothered to jack it up and get a spanner out. Which apparently, a lot of GT car owners do. Porsche believes 80 per cent of its GT cars are used on tracks and that people like to have a tinker around with them. It's lowered 30mm compared to a standard Cayman, the front track is 13mm wider, the brakes are carried over from the GT3, and are upgradable to PCCB ceramics for a smidge under £5,000.

Other options include the one-piece bucket seats from the 918 Spyder. I found them too upright in the 918, but the padding of the £1,907 carbon chairs has been adjusted and now they're just right. The driving position is spot on, the ergonomics of the cabin as close to faultless as I can imagine. Even the pedals are exactly where you want them. Exactly. It's a car that makes you want to drive it properly.

And it looks stunning. It may well be the first Cayman to generate downforce, but the way it sits on the road, the angle of attack of the rear wing, the slammed ride height means it absolutely looks the part.

Isn't there a Club Sport pack, too?

Yep, £2,670 for a rear cage, six point harness and fire extinguisher. If you want to take it racing, Porsche can also add a front cage, too. The message here is that just because this is Porsche's entry level sports car doesn't mean it's gone soft. In fact I reckon it's less forgiving than a GT3. I remember driving that and thinking I could happily live with it every day - the PDK gearbox meant you weren't sweating shifts in traffic and the damping was remarkably supple. The GT4 isn't hard work exactly, but it will bash you about a bit on a bumpy road. If you're not intending to go near a track the GTS might be a better bet.

Do you mean that?

Nope, probably not, just threw it in there to make sure you realise the GT4 is a step on. The grip it generates is outrageous, and I'm not sure the GT3 steers with as much purity - there's real resistance through the steering, making you aware of the forces you're overcoming. I'm not sure it's as tingly with feedback as the old Cayman R's hydraulic set-up, but it's more direct and quicker of rack.

But it inspires confidence?

Completely. You never have any doubt that the GT4 will steer exactly where you want it to at precisely the instant that you want it to. As a driver it doesn't give you many excuses. And the brakes are stellar. The car I drove had PCCB and bar the occasional low speed squeak they were fabulous to use, just so powerful and easy to modulate. A real highlight, in fact.

Any weak points?

None that really deserve mentioning, but I do think you can tell the engine isn't a pure-bred Porsche Motorsport unit. It doesn't rev with quite the same frenzy and snarl and snap, but any deficiency in that area is masked by the noise - it sounds gutturally wonderful, much louder and angrier than in a 911 Carrera S. And with less weight to work against it has great torque, and, above 5,500rpm where the Variocam system gives it both barrels, real 911-threatening turn of pace.

The gearbox is a honey, too. Same basic transmission as a Cayman GTS, but the lever has been cut down by 20mm, so the shifts feel very punchy, you just jab the lever around the gate, and if you have the Sport button pressed, it does the rev matching for you. In fact that is the only thing the Sport button does. One drawback to the gearbox though - those Cayman GTS ratios are too long for the GT4.

Porsche explains it away by saying that they don't want people to have to change up during overtaking opportunities, but more sprint-oriented gearing would suit the car better. Don't bother firming up the standard PASM dampers either - the Nurburgring lap time was achieved with them in normal.

And what was the 'Ring time?

It's 7 minutes 40 seconds. Only 8 seconds slower than a GT3. I reckon that car's PDK gearbox is probably worth several seconds a lap, and that in truth the GT4 is probably a match for its bigger brother. With more centrally located weight, the way it changes direction is astonishing. Front grip is boundless on the road, the whole car feeling locked to the surface, the suspension rigidly controlled.

It's no lighter than a GTS, though, is it?

No, it's the same weight, 1340kg wet. And the reason for that is that many of the new components - and there are over 500 of them - are beefier than those they replace. Look at the size of those brakes - those ceramic discs are a whopping 410mm across, the wheels are 20-inchers, the rear tyres 295-width. Bet the centre of gravity has dropped as a result.

And compared to the GT3?

It's swings and roundabouts. The GT3 remains the purer, more special car, its bespoke engine revving to 9,000rpm, as opposed to 7,800rpm here. Also part of what makes the GT3 so enthralling is that you have to manage that rear-engined layout, and the naturally better balanced Cayman doesn't provide that challenge.

But the attention to detail that's gone into every facet of this car makes it a riveting driving experience at any speed. You can feel the love that has gone into making the GT4 the car we always suspected it could be. It's a step on from a standard Cayman, and, at £64,451 (OK, £73k with a good bit of spec on it), looks rather exceptional value for money for a car that, as far as driving experience goes, can hold its head high alongside some very serious metal indeed.

post from sitemap

Get ready for the electric Audi crossover

Audi will launch an all-electric crossover in 2018, with long-range high-performance batteries. A car, if you will, to go up against the forthcoming Tesla Model X.

Audi's R&D director Dr Ulrich Hackenberg gave Top Gear some detail on the car at the Geneva Motor Show last week, and then made some of the figures official in his speech at the company's AGM today.

"In early 2018, we will launch a battery-powered sports activity vehicle in the large premium segment with a range of more than 500km [310 miles]," he said today. "It will have a new, very attractive design, which we are developing especially for the e-tron range and for battery-electric vehicles. This sports activity vehicle will be built on the second generation of the modular longitudinal platform (MLB2)." That platform is what's under the new Q7.

Last week he'd explained it to me like this: "It's a more passenger-oriented car than the R8 e-Tron, but I'm not saying saloon. It can be used by families, though they will need to have money. It's a big car and needs a big battery capacity." In other words it's expensive. "It will have a specific design - it's not just an A6 or Q5 with a battery drivetrain."

He explained to me that it isn't as tall as the Q5 or Q7 because that adds weight and air resistance. "But if you ask our sales people, everything has to be a Q," he added, referring to the fact that crossovers are such hot sellers. The car is designed by Marc Lichte, who Hackenberg brought into Audi to develop a new design direction, previewed by the Prologue and Prologue Avant.

Years ago Hackenberg engineered the first MLB platform that today sits under cars all the way from the Audi A4 to the Bentley Flying Spur. The second version, MLB2, he says, was designed from the outset to have space for a battery.

He says capacity is getting better, and that by 2020 new batteries will drive, say, an electric Golf 70 percent further than now for the same size and weight. The new R8 e-Tron has a 90kWh battery, slightly more than the 85kWh of the biggest pack in the Tesla Model S. The R8's range is quoted at 450km, so if the new Audi electric crossover is to get 500km it would need at least as much juice.

And it's not just pure electric. He also said in his AGM speech: "We plan to have a plug-in hybrid in every model series in the coming years." We've already tested the A3 e-Tron, and the new Q7 e-Tron was at the Geneva show.

post from sitemap

March 9, 2015

First drive: Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake

  • Next steps

    Book a test drive

    Order a brochure

    Powered by motoring.co.uk

Estate right?

Nope, it's a Shooting Brake, manufacturer speak for a wagon that puts style before everything else, and often used when a coachbuilder makes something longer-roofed from a sports car or coupe.

Apt here then, as the CLA's gestation is somewhat contrived, it being a ‘four-door coupe'. Spun off from the A-Class, the CLA Shooting Brake only adds to the confusion. Merc's got form here though, the CLA's bigger CLS relation similarly conceived, though arguably better executed.

Useful then?

It's certainly more useful than the CLA with which it shares everything forward of the B-pillar. Unsurprisingly the boot's bigger, though only by 25 litres. Where the Shooting Brake wins is its folding seats, which allow more carrying capacity - 1354 litres if you're counting.

That's somewhat countered though by the boot's hatch, which is pinched by those shapely rear lights, and its lip is high, too. Practicality is not at the top of the CLA Shooting Brake's key selling points then, though that new roofline does mean it's a bit less claustrophobic for those sat in the back, headroom improving by around 4cm.

It's pretty though...

The transformation from pinched bum, somewhat awkwardly proportioned CLA four-door coupe to CLA Shooting Brake is undeniably successful. That longer roof does wonders for the proportions, both in profile and from the rear. Though inside it feels little different except for a differing view out of the rear window.

And to drive?

We didn't get too excited about how the standard CLA relation drove, and the addition of around 30kg of weight to the rear does little to change that. That has fractionally changed the weight over each axle, but it's so infinitesimal you'd need measuring equipment to notice it.

Curiously the 355bhp CLA 45 AMG flagship does come with slightly softer suspension, AMG's bods assuming buyers are less likely to take it to a track. Likewise, there's no performance pack option offered on it.

Not that most will notice, as the majority of sales will be of the diesels, these using a 2.1-litre turbodiesel of with 134 and 167bhp outputs. They might please on the tax front, but Merc's 2.1 diesel is a bit of grumbly performer; old-school diesel at times in its rattle, and rather unbecoming for something so pretty. The CDIs are only offered with front-wheel drive, too, which given their ample torque - 258lb ft with the 167bhp CLA 220 CDI - can all be a bit much for the front wheels.

The steering is pretty mute, though the ride, on smooth German tarmac at least, proved decent enough - though we're pretty sure that it might get a bit busy on Britain's less than perfectly surfaced roads.

Not one to get excited about then?

It might be pretty, but that's about all it's got going for it. If you're after a hopeless estate then Volvo's V60 fills the brief - even offering an AMG alternative in Polestar guise.

If you really want a more practical CLA then save some money and buy the A-Class. The car that it's originally based on, cheaper and only losing out on outright carrying capacity by around 200 litres. That's about the same as a decent-sized roof box, even if there is a bit less roof to strap it to.

post from sitemap