June 21, 2015

First drive: Hyundai i30 Turbo

Ooh, a turbo badge on a hatchback. Have we gone back to the heady days of the 1980s and ‘90s?

Err, not quite, but we'll come to that shortly. That turbo badge though, does signify something quite seismic for the South Korean giant. This Hyundai i30 Turbo is - cue Dr Evil close-up - the most powerful Hyundai i30 ever built.

Woohoo! A proper Golf GTI rival, right?

Err, again, not quite. The premise is set up nicely, mind. It boasts Hyundai's 1.6-litre, four-cylinder ‘Gamma GDI' engine, here turbocharged to produce a 28 per cent hike in power and 38 per cent torque gain over the regular 1.6. More horsepowers, more torques, all good.

It's also got stiffer, ‘sports-tuned' suspension, a six-speed manual gearbox (no auto here), a more direct steering setup, and bigger, 300mm ventilated brake discs up front, and 284mm solid jobbies at the back.

Sounds promising...

There's more. The whole car was engineered at Hyundai's test facility, nestled deep in the grounds of the Nürburgring. Yep, whisper it, but this i30 Turbo was subjected to 110 laps of the ‘Ring every week, over the course of a four-to-six week period. That's like all the Rocky training montages in one. All of them. In one, gruelling session.

Then there's the little details that lift it over and above the lesser, non-Turbo i30s: the new grille, a set of new bumpers front and back, a new LED design, twin exhausts, 18in alloys, black headlining, sports seats, red interior detailing, a sports instrument cluster and contrast stitching on the wheel, gearstick and door.

So what's it like?

Nice.

That's it?

It's good, but it's not as quick as that premise. The engine produces 183bhp and 195lb ft of torque between 1,500rpm and 4,500rpm, all delivered to the front wheels. Decent, punchy figures, but nothing to trouble the traditional hot hatch establishment.

It rides really nicely - it errs towards the fussier side at times, if you've got your pointy-hat-of-critical-road-testing on - but on the whole it's a smart, refined thing. Body control is good. There's lots of grip. It can go around corners at speed without ruffling too many of your feathers, if you have feathers, that is. Looks great, too.

I'm sensing a ‘but'.

You sense correctly. The steering doesn't, um, feel right. You can change the assistance - through Comfort, Normal and Sport - and it turns in keenly, but none are satisfying enough for the committed corner enthusiast. It's perfectly fine for rational human beings, mind, but if your palms like to know what flavour of tarmac you're on, you won't get much info.

Also, the engine needs a better note. It's not exactly inviting.

Ah. How much is it, then?

Here's the other killer. A three-door Hyundai i30 Turbo costs £22,500. A five-door version costs £23,000. A five-door Ford Focus ST costs £22,495. The Ford, sadly for Hyundai, produces 247bhp and 265lb ft of torque.

The ST will also go from 0-62mph in 6.5 seconds. The Hyundai? Eight seconds. The Focus also steers with much more conviction.

So what do I do?

The regular i30 is a cracking new car. Smooth, comfortable and well judged. This Turbo strays into a really tough price category. Sure, it's lovely inside, feels well-built and all that, and if it was cheaper, we'd say definitely consider it. The ST though, just ticks more boxes. Lower down the spec, the i30 works. Up here, it needs to be a bit better.

But, it doesn't need much work to make it a firecracker, and the fundamentals feel well sorted. And you're probably not even paying attention to these words, because who else offers a ruddy five-year unlimited mileage warranty?

post from sitemap

First drive: new Mazda MX-5 2.0i

  • Next steps

    Book a test drive

    Order a brochure

    Powered by motoring.co.uk

We've seen the new MX-5 already, no?

Yup, and we've driven it. But that was the entry-level, 1.5-litre version. This is the more powerful 2.0 - the one the keen drivers are likely to beeline to.

I'm one of those. Give me some numbers.

Like its little brother, the 2.0 possesses four cylinders and zero turbos, the MX-5 remaining true to its rev-happy, naturally aspirated ethos. With 158bhp and 148lb ft, it's 29bhp and 37lb ft up on the 1.5.

Power may remain modest, then, but with just 1,075kg to shift, the 0-62mph sprint takes 7.3 seconds. That's one second quicker than the 1.5-litre and enough to have this MX-5 knocking on the door of heavier hot hatchbacks.

While its 158bhp is identical to the outgoing 2.0's, the engine is completely new, being one of Mazda's thrifty Skyactiv units. It's 8kg lighter than its forebear, and its 161g/km and 40.9mpg ought to be far more attainable than the somewhat artificial figures claimed by turbocharged cars.

So how much does it cost?

At £20,095, the entry 2.0 is £1,600 pricier than the cheapest MX-5, but compare like-for-like specs with the 1.5 and the premium is a more palatable £850. This is good value: as well as more power, you get bigger 17in alloy wheels and a limited-slip differential on the back axle.

If you're keen to explore the little Mazda's front-engine, rear-drive layout, the diff and extra power make a difference, and less than a grand to add them could be a no-brainer.

So is it loads faster than the 1.5?

In truth, the difference between the 2.0 and the 1.5 is not night and day. Both have a similarly rorty, if workmanlike soundtrack, and both feel short on lungs in a world of 200bhp Fiestas and Corsas.

But the 2.0 represents a notable step up under sustained acceleration, making lighter work of overtakes. It just pulls that bit harder, asks of a bit less effort, and out of corners it serves up more options.

It's more willing to exhibit the benefits of a sweetly set-up rear-driver than the 1.5, its extra power allowing a nice little squiggle out of corners if you so desire.

Don't think that means you need to be Ken Block-esque to enjoy this, though. Quite the opposite, in fact. The MX-5 likes to pitch and roll in corners, which would anger more stringent (read German) manufacturers enough to inspire a new electronic acronym to flatten things out.

Such behaviour fits the MX-5's role on this planet sweetly, though, Mazda making a concerted effort not to change its roadster's approachable character. And the MX-5's very physical messages about its balance allow it to feel interactive and involving at lovely, modest speeds. The kind you do on normal roads as opposed to race tracks.

So it's a laugh to drive?

Definitely. And it's not all down to the balance: the driving position is sweet and the snickety gearchange superb, a great exemplar for saving the manual.

It's all about the simple pleasures here. There are no driving modes to toggle through, there's a big rev counter slap bang in front of your eyes, and its convertible roof is manual, opening in mere seconds under human, rather than electric, power.

The newly electric power steering follows the script you've read elsewhere, lacking any real feel or weight. But it's the only real chink in the armour, and such is the alacrity of the MX-5's turn in, and the transparency of its balance, it's hard to care too much. You'll be having too much fun for that.

Anything else of note?

Upgrade to top-spec Sport trim and you get fancier suspension, starring Bilstein dampers, while there's plenty of big boy technology on the options list.

A highlight is a Bose stereo with nine speakers, a pair of them in the headrests so that your music isn't carried away with the wind when the roof is down. It works well.

Less appealing, we'd say, is a gamut of active safety stuff, including blind-spot monitoring and lane-departure warnings. In a car this dinky and open, we'd argue it's all a bit unnecessary.

Is the 2.0 a no-brainer, then?

If you like your MX-5s for driving more than tanning, we'd say yes. The jump in cost isn't huge and you'll extract noticeably more satisfaction from it.

But the difference isn't big enough to shame the still excellent 1.5 if you're short on cash or simply not fussed about fractional degrees of cornering precision.

The moral of the story? You can't really buy a bad MX-5...

post from sitemap

June 19, 2015

First (taster) drive: new Audi R8 V10 Plus

  • Next steps

    Book a test drive

    Order a brochure

    Powered by motoring.co.uk

What's this?

A very brief first drive of one of 2015's most hotly anticipated cars: the second coming of the Audi R8. The first gen-car was a revelation in the everyday supercar game - fun, fast, usable and relatively affordable.

It did more for Audi's reputation than handing out free sweeties and flu jabs with every new A3 would have. Short of the turbocharged Ferrari 488 GTB, few cars this year have a predecessor as tough to emulate. No pressure, then.

Only a brief drive, though?

Afraid so. Audi said we could drive the new R8, but only for one fairly fast lap around the full Le Mans de la Sarthe circuit, on a sweltering June afternoon. Oh and there was the small matter of 250,000 spectators, as we commandeered the circuit an hour before the 2015 race kicked off. Yikes.

We'll be driving the car more extensively in just a few weeks, but this encounter is a tantalising chance for the R8 to make a good first impression.

Which R8 are we talking here?

Naturally, the quickest. We tried the R8 V10 Plus, which uses a reworked version of the old car's 5.2-litre V10 to drive all four wheels. The entry-level V8 is dead, so too the delicious open-gate manual. All new R8s, whether you get the £119,500 532bhp V10 version or the £18k pricier, 70bhp dicier V10 Plus, are fitted with a seven-speed S-tronic dual-clutch gearbox.

Audi claims this 602bhp flagship car will hit 62mph in 3.2 seconds and top out at 201mph. Take note, fact fans: it's the fastest road-going Audi ever.

First impressions?

It's far from an ugly car - and certainly more handsome than we'd feared judging from those dreadful early CGI shots. But, beyond a few straighter edges and the splitting of the nicely distinctive ‘sideblade' into two sections, it's quite ‘facelifty' to look at. Much like the new TT, the good vibes are saved for inside.

Because wow, does the R8 have a good interior. It pinches the TT's air-con vent screens and Virtual Cockpit instruments, but the architecture is so arch-modern. It's also more intuitive than the willfully silly Lamborghini Huracan, with which this R8 shares its aluminium-carbon chassis, engine and transmission. The Star Trek-spec gear selector is particularly cool - a huge, macho lever you retract with gusto to select Drive. Looks like it's come off some classified military hardware.

Visibility trounces the ‘letterbox windows equals sense of occasion' Lambo too, and the shorter steering wheel paddles fit your hand more comfortably than the Italian car's razor blades. Feels like you sit a little too high, maybe. So far, so R8.

What's the new R8 like to drive?

Easy. We didn't get time, or chance, to pootle in the R8. It was a case of strap in, flick the engine start button, and nail the thing out of the Le Mans pit exit. So how it rides on the road, and how the gearbox behaves on part-throttle will have to wait. This is what the R8 is like to drive fast. A doddle.

Boring, then?

No, just that even in raw-protein-shake Plus guise, the R8 is still fabulously approachable. Quattro traction is absolute - it took full throttle on half a turn of steering lock out of the tight Arnage right-hander. Not a whiff of under- or oversteer. It just ‘steered'. Rather nicely, in fact, with a helpful touch of weight just off-centre and easy turn-in. Bodes well...

Carrying more speed through Tetre Rouge or the sweeping Porsche Curves show the R8 hasn't lost any of its balance, but that it's got very fast. Lambo Huracan fast. The mid-range sucker punch of the twin-turbo McLaren or Ferrari rivals is absent, I'd suspect, but can they offer an 8500rpm redline, or noise and throttle response this sharp? Hurrah for natural aspiration.

What else?

Full credit for the car's superb transmission can't go to the new R8 - Audi squeezed S-tronic into the old car when it was facelifted. It's a seamless piece of kit, with just enough of a nudge in the back in Dynamic mode to treat you for hitting high revs.

Brakes? Yes, it's got some. Ceramic as standard on the Plus, with slightly dead pedal feel. But I barely got them past room temperature on the solitary lap, so we can't tell you if they fade or run out of ideas before the driver. Sorry. Doubtful, though.

A good first encounter, then?

For sure. But, given how close the new R8's recipe is to its forebear, we'd have been a bit shocked if Audi had screwed it all up. On this very brief, smash-and-grab first taste, we'd wager it's business as usual.

post from sitemap

For sale: £2.9m Maserati 'Boomerang'

This is a Maserati concept car. It is coming up for auction later this year, and it is expected to sell for as much as £2.9m. That's a lot of wedge for, well, a wedge.

Why so much cash for an old pointy, Italian car? Well, designed by Giorgetto Giugiaro, this Maserati ‘Boomerang' first made its public debut at the 1971 Turin Motor Show. 1971, when the rest of world was driving, y'know, Austin Maxis. Jaws, we suspect, may have dropped.

Just look at the thing. Giugiaro must have gone through a classroom-worth of rulers making this one, but there's no mistaking its appeal. Following its debut in Turin, the Boomerang was shown again at Geneva the following year, this time with proper running gear and the ability to move under its own propulsion.

Maserati developed the Boomerang over the chassis of the gorgeous Bora, complete with a 300bhp V8 and a top speed of 186mph (300km/h). And because it's a concept, it's a strict one-off, this one having more recently being shown off at places such as Villa d'Este and Pebble Beach.

"It's considered by many to be one of the most remarkable designs of the 20th century," explains Bonhams' Philip Kantor.

It works, is fully road-registered, and is being offered up at Bonhams' Chantilly Sale, which takes place on 5 September. It's pricey, but is it worth it?

post from sitemap

Top Gear talent search: how to apply

Yesterday, Chris Evans announced he was kicking off a worldwide audition to find potential talent for the next series of Top Gear.

And now we can tell you how to do it. Chris wants you to send your 30-second audition video to topgear@bbc.co.uk – and do make sure it's no longer than 30 seconds, or the clip won't be accepted.

Chris Evans: Jeremy's given me some advice

Importantly, your audition tape should feature no gimmicks, no stunts, and – most importantly – no cars, please. Just you, and you alone to camera, being enthusiastic and car-obsessed and, well...TG-ish.

You must be 17 or older to enter, and entries will be accepted from all over the world.

Naturally there are many, many terms and conditions, which you probably ought to cast your eyes over before submitting your clip.

Search for a Top Gear star: terms and conditions 

You'll need to send your clips to Chris before July 20 this year, so get a wriggle on.

"You could be auditioning to be a driver, you could be Stig, who knows?" explains Chris. "You could be auditioning to be a film reporter. You could be a co-host. If there's nobody right for this from the videos, we will not be appointing anyone. This is not a gimmick. This is real."

So who's Chris looking for?

"Male, female, old, young, it doesn't matter," he says. "The one thing that does matter is that you've got to have a real appetite for cars, and you've got to know something about cars.

"You can be a mechanic, you can be an amateur racing car driver, you can be a guy who's a fireman but who's been building his own Land Rover in his shed for five years, but you've got to know about cars..."

Do you fit that broad-yet-strangely-specific description? Then you know what to do. That email address to send your clips, once again, is topgear@bbc.co.uk. Best of luck!

post from sitemap

June 18, 2015

Here it is: new Peugeot 308 GTI

Peugeot has today decided to reveal the hardest, fastest production hot hatch to date. It is called the 308 GTI, it is available in two power outputs, and it will arrive soon to do battle with the Ford Focus RS, Renaultsport Megane, VW Golf GTI, Seat Leon Cupra and, yeah, you get the picture.

Scheduled for a public debut at the upcoming Goodwood Festival of Speed, the new 308 GTI will be offered in a 250bhp version - dubbed the GTI 250, naturally - and will accelerate from 0-62mph in 6.2 seconds.

The higher spec GTI 270 version, however, produces a chunkier 270bhp - the same as the RCZ R - and will complete the benchmark sprint in six seconds flat. Not quite the Golf R's 5.3s - nor the new Civic Type R's 5.3s - but suitably quicker than the standard Golf GTI (6.5s).

Top Gear's top five hot hatchbacks

Both cars run on to 155mph, and feature the 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine that Peugeot rather likes. There's a ‘supercharged' air cooling system, installed below the front bumper, and a new double oil spray system to keep those hard-working pistons cool.

The 308 GTI 270 also comes with ‘race-developed' 380mm carbon brake discs up front, mounted on aluminium hubs, with four piston fixed calipers. This 270 also gets a proper Torsen limited slip differential up front, which should spell good news for the avoidance of rampant understeer.

Both cars get a specific front suspension setup, featuring new springs and specific damping calibration, with the chassis also featuring aluminium wishbones and a semi-hollow anti-roll bar.

The 308 GTI gets wider tracks front and back, and sits 11mm lower than the standard 308. Visually, there's a new black radiator grille, two front spoilers for additional aero, new door sills, and a new rear design.

Ten of the most powerful hot hatches

Wheel-wise, the GTI 250 comes with 18-inch alloys, while the GTI 270 gets spangly new 19s. Just watch those kerbs. Seats are supplied, of the bucket variety for the 270, and you also get a steering wheel, here in full-grain leather and sized by modern Peugeot standards. It's tiny, in other words.

There is also a touch-screen display, and a big red Sport button you'll find impossible not to keep pressing. Once activated, it'll change the dash colour from white to red, makes the exhaust a little bit shoutier, and changes the accelerator mapping to ‘helmsman'*.

If you care about such things, it'll officially return 47.1mpg and emit 139g/km of CO2, but there's a reason we've stuffed this information right down here.

Prices start at £26,555 for the GTI 250, and £28,155 for the GTI 270. Sounds exciting. Reckon this has the stones to bring back the Peugeot GTI magic reignited by the 208 GTI? Or would you prefer a Focus RS? Or a Megane RS? Or a Golf GTI? Or a...

First drive: Peugeot 208 GTI 30th Anniversary

*Not an official Peugeot term

post from sitemap

June 17, 2015

This is the new Mercedes-Benz GLC

This is the GLC: not, early-Noughties-obscure-reference fans, a controversial Welsh hip-hop outfit, but rather Mercedes-Benz's latest offering in the premium SUV sector.

It's the brother to the sporty GLC Coupe concept we saw in Shanghai a couple of months ago, and replaces the old GLK SUV (a car we never got in Britain). Still struggling to place it? Well, the GLC is a rival to the Audi Q5 and BMW X3, and thus a rather profitable segment of the meaty SUV pie.

As such, it boasts some grown-up underpinnings, namely those of the new C-Class saloon. At 4.6m in length, 1.8m in width and 1.6m high (a fraction taller if you spec the ‘off-road' pack), it's basically a C-Class saloon on stilts, and pretty much bang-on for size compared to its German rivals.

And it follows the neat, sporty lines first shown on the GLC Coupe, too, Mercedes informing us that it "favours sensual purity and a modern aesthetic over the classic off-road look". Nicely understated, or a bit... forgettable? You decide.

You get four powertrains on launch - 168bhp and 201bhp versions of Merc's four-pot 2.2-litre diesel (GLC 220d and GLC 250d), and a 208bhp 2.0-litre petrol in the GLC 250, good for a 0-62mph time of 7.3 seconds.

Then there's the petrol-electric GLC 350e, which combines that same 2.0-litre petrol engine to an electric motor, for a combined 323bhp output and 413lb ft of torque. This one will officially emit just 60g/km of CO2, yet sprint to 62mph in 5.9 seconds. Not bad.

The GLC is 80kg lighter than the old GLK - thanks to an entirely new body and use of aluminium - and all versions come with permanent ‘4MATIC' four-wheel-drive (with a basic torque split of 45:55 front/rear), and a nine-speed gearbox on everything bar the hybrid. That car gets just seven gears. Pah.

Merc offers steel springs and active dampers as standard, or you could plump for full air suspension. If you're feeling especially lavish, you could also spec the ‘off-road' pack, which adds five more programmes to the dynamic setup, including a ‘slippery' setting, one for ‘incline', one for ‘rocking assist' and ‘trailer'.

There is also an inside to the car, and it has been lavished with much attention, including nappa leather, open-pore wood trim, an optional panoramic glass roof, and much digital integration. You get like, seats and stuff too, but also more space in between them: elbow, shoulder and leg room is all up over the GLK.

UK prices have yet to be announced, but it'll go on sale in Europe with a base price of €44,506 - which is just under 32,000 of our finest English pounds.

Still unsure as to where this fits into Merc's SUV strategy? Well, in little-to-large scale, you're looking at the GLA, this GLC, a potential GLC Coupe, then the GLE, GLE Coupe, and upcoming GLS. Oh, and the venerable G-Wagen, of course. All clear?

post from sitemap

June 16, 2015

Chris Evans to lead new Top Gear line-up!

Everybody, we have some very big news! Yes, Chris Evans has signed a three-year deal to lead an all new line up for Top Gear.

And it's straight over to the man himself: "I'm thrilled, Top Gear is my favourite programme of all time. Created by a host of brilliant minds who love cars and understand how to make the massively complicated come across as fun, devil-may-care and effortless. When in fact, of course, it's anything but and that's the genius of Top Gear's global success.

"I promise I will do everything I possibly can to respect what has gone on before and take the show forward."

Kim Shillinglaw, Controller of BBC Two and BBC Four, said:

"I'm so delighted that Chris will be presenting the next series of Top Gear. His knowledge of and passion for cars is well-known, and combined with his sheer inventiveness and cheeky unpredictability he is the perfect choice to take our much-loved show into the future.

"Chris is a huge fan of Top Gear and has great respect for the craft and work ethic of one of the best production teams in the world. He knows the phenomenal attention to detail it takes to make a single sequence of Top Gear, let alone a whole series. He is already full of brilliant ideas and I can't wait for him to get started."

Tim Davie, CEO of BBC Worldwide, said: "It‘s fantastic news for Top Gear fans around the world that such a brilliant broadcaster as Chris will be the figurehead for the brand across the globe."

We can also confirm that production on the new series of Top Gear will start in the next few weeks.

More news as we have it...

post from sitemap

Video: we heart Lebanese hill climbs

We have to admit that, up until this morning, we weren't too clued-up on the world of Lebanese motorsport.

But now, thanks to the power of the internet, we're massive fans of Lebanese motorsport.

Because, it turns out, while some race drivers spent literally a whole day endlessly lapping the French countryside, one brave man pointed a rather bonkers Mitsubishi Evo at the summit of a hill in Falougha, Lebanon and gave it the beans.

This man was Roger Feghali, who was competing in a prototype Mitsubishi Evo VI against his brother, Abdo.

Hammond's Icons: Mitsubishi Evo VI Tommi Mäkinen

In the second round of the 2015 Lebanese Hill Climb Championship, Roger gave it his all to walk away with a record-breaking run and an internet-breaking video.

As you'll see above, Roger not shy in trusting the limits of grip of his turbocharged Mitsu: click play to see him jump, slither and drift his way up the twisting route.

But aside from the driving part - which is very impressive - it's the sound of the Evo that's got us going. With a boosty turbo and trick anti-lag system it flutters, squeaks, pops, bangs and ffmmmpphhs like a firework display in an industrial popcorn making facility.

Surely this is all the ammunition Mitsu needs to bring another Evo back into the world?

post from sitemap

June 15, 2015

Jaguar XJ gets more power and tech

Ladies, gents and wannabe high-end crims: this is your new Jaguar XJ.

Jag’s largest saloon has had its biggest update since its 2010 introduction, with more of the good stuff, namely power and technology.
 
Cosmetic changes have been limited to fancy new LED light patterns, which is good: to our eyes at least, this is the best and boldest looking limo-saloon on sale, even after five years on sale.
 
The tech highlights of the new car include updated infotainment controls – righting one of the XJ’s most offensive wrongs – which sit at the human finger end of a 1,300 watt, 26-speaker stereo. Quite where 26 speakers fit and how necessary they all are is surely trivialised by what exceedingly good golf club bragging rights they serve up.
 
‘All-Surface Progress Control’ is a clunky name for some useful, Land Rover developed tech that should ensure un-crashy progress on icy surfaces, the car taking care of power and braking and only asking for steering inputs from the driver below 18mph.
 
Four-wheel drive is optional with some engines, while electric power steering is standard on all XJs. The replacement of feelsome old hydraulic racks with light, efficient electric alternatives has upset purists in many a car of late, but in something big like the XJ, it ought to be less of an issue.
 
This has always been the most fun and agile car in its class, mind, with far more encouragement to sit up front than the rest of its limo rivals. All the better for enjoying the additional power bequeathed upon the 3-litre V6 diesel version, the one most people will buy.
 
With 296bhp, it’s up 25bhp, yet it’s cleaner, too, its 149g/km emissions and 49.6mpg more in line with small hot hatches than big barges. It’s also the engine that kicks off the XJ range at £58,690, a couple of grand more than before.
 
You’re reading Top Gear, though, so the one you really want is the XJR (above, white). Only available in short rather than long wheelbase trim, and with an engine tried-and-tested elsewhere rather than all-new, it doesn’t make headlines as the XJ gets a rejig.
 
But with its 542bhp supercharged petrol V8 nabbed from the F-Type R, it’s the naughtiest XJ by far, gargling away enough to satisfy even the most lavish getaway driver fantasies.
 
It costs £92,405, though with the poshest LWB XJs topping £100k, it’s not the biggest pile of (possibly stolen) cash you can throw at a big Jag.
 
We’re big fans, but do you agree? Is this the car that would fill the big posh bus space in your lottery-win lock-up, or is the new BMW 7-Series more your thing?

post from sitemap

June 14, 2015

First drive: Bentley Continental GT

What's this, then?

A mid-life freshen-up for the Bentley Continental GT, a visual nip/tuck that starts at the front bumper and finishes at the rear spoiler and does, well, not that much in between.

Really?

Really. As facelifts go, this is one of the more minor. The front bumper has been chiselled, there are new B-for-Bentley vents on the front flanks, three new colours, more leather choices, and knurled gearlever paddles.

Need more excitement? Well, wi-fi is now standard, there are new fonts for the dials and a reshaped steering wheel.

What about more power?

Oh yes, a bit of that too, but you're not going to feel a gain of 15bhp when the W12 was already developing 567 of the suckers. That's a 2.6 per cent power hike. Whoop.

The other engines remain where they were - the entry-level V8 has 500bhp, the uprated V8 S 521bhp, and the flagship W12 Speed sticks on 626bhp. Oodles. No, the big news as far as engines go isn't the power, but the economy. The W12 joins the V8 in having a cylinder shut-off system. No mean feat, you'd imagine, given that it has four banks of cylinders...

Does that actually save any fuel?

Apparently so. Due to the engine's massive torque, Bentley claims the 6.0-litre W12 can actually run as a 3.0-litre V6 quite a bit of the time. The official economy figure for the standard 6.0 has risen from 19.5 to 20.1mpg, but privately Bentley believes the real world gains could be as much as 20 per cent.

When I've driven Contis before they've always done about 15-16mpg, but this one was reading 18.4, so maybe there's some truth in it.

Hardly economical, though.

No, but then if you can afford upwards of £140,300 (yep, that's the base price now, the W12 Speed sits at 168,300, having gone up £11,600 from last year), you'll be more concerned about how often you're stopping for fuel rather than how much it's costing you. The 20-gallon tank should mean you'll get at least 350 miles between glugs.

Does the Conti feel different as a result of these changes?

Not really, although it does look a bit sharper. Personally, although the front end is now more defined, I think the extra scoops low down are too reminiscent of an Audi RS.

Inside is good, too, with new straight fluting available for the seats (diamond pattern is still the way forward if you ask me), Alcantara headlining, LED illumination and updated brightwork. Detail changes, but this is probably all the Conti needs.

How so?

Because this is Bentley's Porsche 911, the car that defines the brand to such an extent they can't afford to tamper with it too much. Also, name me a car that truly, genuinely does what this one does - a real luxury GT. Not a Maserati GranTurismo, nor a Porsche 911 - too cramped and sporty. BMW 6-Series? Far too common. Rolls-Royce Wraith? Too stately and you're into parts-of-a-million pricing. The only thing I came up with is the new Merc S-Class Coupe. That's a lovely car, and really the only rival I'd drive if I was considering a Conti GT, but it doesn't have the same sense of imperious progress and craftsmanship. Bentley knows its audience for this car so accurately that I'd swear each car is orientated to a specific buyer.

What do you mean?

If you're young, have a V8, if you're old, a W12 and if you like to gad about in the spirit of a Bentley Boy, have one with a suffix. Preferably ‘Speed'.

In all seriousness, the V8 S is probably the pick of the range. It's so strong and has a good dollop of charisma. The W12 is massively smooth, but a bit too hushed in standard trim.

The Speed brings the noise and spirit back - it's deeply, deeply fast. 0-60mph in 4.0secs doesn't sound that fast these days, but then no Bentley has launch control - not really in the spirit of things, old chap. Give this thing the ability to depart the line with 4,000rpm on the dial and I bet you'd be looking at a sub-4 time.

Once up and running, the W12 is mighty. And it's mighty everywhere from about 1,200rpm on. There's just so much torque. It's loveliest in manual mode - stick it in a high gear and 607lb ft get to work on your lower spine.

But the V8 S is the one to have?

It is if you like driving. It manages its weight better than the W12, and does a passable impression of sportiness. The body control is exceptional for something weighing over 2.2 tonnes.

Until something goes wrong. You hit a patch of standing water, a nasty mid-corner ridge, and you're suddenly very aware of how much weight is being asked to behave itself. Good trick up to that point though.

So no quantum shift for the Conti?

As I said before, this car is already so well targeted at its audience, I don't think there's much Bentley can do that they're not already doing. The only obvious ‘improvement' would be to add hybrid technology to boost the smoothness/torque appeal yet further.

Last year, then-CEO Wolfgang Schreiber said that by the end of this decade 90 per cent of Bentleys would be available with hybrid technology. Provided they've not changed their mind on that, I'm going to assume that the reason this facelift is so minor is that Bentley is busy preparing something much more dramatic for the next generation...

W12 Speed specs:

5998cc, W12 twin-turbo, 626bhp, 607lb ft, 0-60mph in 4.0secs, 206mph max, 19.4mpg, 338g/km

post from sitemap

June 13, 2015

Renault’s Alpine sports car is here

This is Renault's Alpine Celebration concept, revealed in La Sarthe just ahead of the Le Mans 24 Hour race. No question it's pretty, but what does it mean?

Well, officially this Celebration is nothing more a design study to, um, celebrate the 60th birthday of Alpine, the French creator of beautiful, fast, lightweight cars acquired by Renault in 1973.

Renault makes much mention of how the concept references the greatest hits in Alpine's racing catalogue - note the ‘tape-cross' headlights, centre-locking wheels and other neatly retro touches.

But, despite the fact there's a two-seat Alpine sports car on the way from Renault, Renault is adamant that the concept doesn't preview its upcoming two-seat Alpine sports car. Oh no. This is a mere design study, Renault says, nothing more than a marking of six decades of Alpine.

Unfortunately this means Renault is staying frustratingly schtum on the details of what might underpin its definitely-not-production-previewing concept car. Powertrain? Performance? Not a sausage.

Which means we'll simply have to wildly speculate. Renault's A110-50 concept of 2012, remember, used a racing V6, but bosses at the time admitted the production car's powertrain would be a trifle less exotic (though definitely not electric).

Given Renault told us a couple of years ago it would pitch a production two-seater somewhere between the Lotus Elise and Porsche Cayman, we'd guess it'd need to make power somewhere in the 250bhp-300bhp region.

Which'd make the production two-seat Alpine, we'd suggest, an ideal candidate for some version of the Renaultsport Megane's two-litre turbo petrol - which, as we know, fits a treat with Renault's six-speed manual gearbox. In a rear-drive sports car, surely there'd be no excuse for a flappy-paddle DCT transmission?

As for price, well, who knows? Pitching between the Elise and Cayman would put a two-seat Renault sports car somewhere in the £30,000-£40,000 bracket, but as the Alfa 4C proved, it's easy to spiral north from there.

If it were to weigh in much over 40 grand, however, the Alpine would bump into some mighty serious performance metal, not least the hotter versions of that annoyingly brilliant Cayman.

All this, however, is mere speculation. What we can tell you for sure is that the Celebration (anyone else picturing the tiny chocolates every time they read that?) looks very, very good. There's a hint of Audi TT about the profile, and maybe a little of the Toyota GT86 in the front end, but overall it looks an individual, plausible bit of design.

Lose those stickers and a few of the dafter racing baubles, fit a more sensible set of wing mirrors, alloys and lights, and you're looking at a car not far from production, we'd say.

Which, of course, it definitely isn't. But let's just say, hypothetically, that is was - well, would you buy a rear-drive, two-seat Alpine sports car that looked a bit like this?

post from sitemap

Bloodhound: how do you stop a 1000mph car?

The world's fastest man isn't best pleased.

Andy Green has just marched into the canteen at ex-RAF base Bentwaters, scowled at the queue around the drinks fridge and tutted: "Who decided to put the fridge in the narrowest part of the room?" That's attention to detail for you.

It's about the only time a wide grin ever leaves the rangy Wing Commander's face, despite today being the D-Day for his 1000mph company car's brakes. Talk about a stiff upper lip.

Of course, with our peerless record of driving very fast down runways (ahem), TG is naturally happy to help test the braking system for the Bloodhound SSC, the new land speed record project aiming for the world's first four-figure speedo reading in 2017.

Bloodhound will use disc brakes below 200mph, and perforated airbrakes to initially slow its charge. But a good old-fashioned parachute will still handle the lion's share of the stopping.

And before the chute is packed into the back of a giant firework with Andy Green strapped to the pointy end, the release mechanism needs testing. We need a fast car.

Somehow, this has led to me strapping myself into a stickered up Jaguar F-type R Coupe with an ominous metal canister sticking through its back window like a badly packed camping stove. Jaguar's now an official partner in the Bloodhound project - the very engine that powers this 542bhp V8 Jag will be used as a the fuel pump for the record car's rocket motor. That's right: Bloodhound's fuel pump makes 542bhp.

Jaguar is also providing the reconnaissance vehicles for the attempt, just as it did back in 1997 when Andy Green drove Thrust SSC through the sound barrier at Black Rock Desert, Nevada. Straight into the record books too, scoring a searing 763mph average. The F-type R is Jag's fastest current model, up for 62mph in 3.9 seconds and a modest top whack of, erm, 186mph. Should be brisk enough for firing parachutes out the back, anyhow.

Doubtless you're scoffing about now.

"Parachutes have been around for decades," you're snorting. "They daily bring skydivers safely back to Earth and restrain dragsters time after time without complaint. Why are you bothering to test this one?"

It's a harsh lesson learned from the last time an outright land speed record was set. Thrust SSC made several unsuccessful attempts on the record because it overshot its stopping point at the end of one supersonic run. The rules state your car must complete two runs in opposite directions within one hour, so people don't employ cheeky slope and massive tailwind to crank up their result.

Thrust SSC's electronic release mechanism was decimated by the heat and vibration you'd expect from smashing Mach 1 in a dust bowl. The parachutes were a weak link. With Bloodhound targeting a 35 per cent higher v-max, this time there'll be no room to coast to a stop if the chutes don't obey Andy's command.

A simple cable-operated mechanical mechanism is supposed to make the parachutes behave this time. It's a remarkably elegant solution, and tinier than you might expect.
Andy explains: "The two-metre diameter parachute is identical to what Richard [Noble] used on Thrust 2 in 1983. It just so happens - spookily - that a two-metre chute is the perfect size for us."

Andy also points out something remarkable about the small puffs of dust released from the parachutes as the Jag barrels past at 150mph on another test run.

"That's Black Rock [Desert] dust," he says airily.

Eh? "These are the []actual[] parachutes that stopped Thrust SSC?"

"Yes," replies Green in his typical ‘why are you remotely impressed by that' matter-of-fact tone. "That's the great thing about parachutes. As long as you store them properly - a cool, dry, dark place to preserve the nylon - they'll last for years..."

So, with the dusty but apparently hard-as-nails chute rammed into the deployment canister, the release mechanism armed, and the Jag topped up with a couple of thimbles of fuel (a full tank could upset the weight balance when the 'chute tensions), it's time to peel off down Bentwaters' gritty 1.7-mile tarmac.

I spin the car 180 degrees at the runway limit and aim the nose back down the airstrip. Various warning lights are blinking on the dashboard, as if the car's electronic brain knows the body's been hacked about, and the car's up to no good.

Heat-haze melts the surface into shimmers a few hundred yards ahead, so the braking point - marked by a bush the team have planted at the runway edge - isn't visible. Meanwhile, the pit team warns about speed over the radio. A vicious crosswind has swept in. I'm not being a wuss here - it's the sort of gust you could lean into to take the weight off your feet.

The Bloodhound guys are worried about how much the gale will disrupt the parachute. Theoretically, the Jag will just about crack 180mph down here, but this is a severely expensive piece of equipment that can't be risked. I'm asked to aim for a 130-140mph maximum as we pass the marker-bush.

No problem. The F-type might be lugging along the weight of a roll cage and parachute gubbins, but its interior has been largely stripped. Besides, you could unfurl the chute at the start line and the R Coupe would still leap off the line like a train. A smoky, coal-fired train at that.

0-100mph is dealt with in around nine seconds, and I'm passing 135mph so early I have to lift off just before the car reaches its deciduous braking point.

Leaving my left hand clamped around the F-type's podgy steering wheel, my right hand grips the fabric rip-cord - taped to the roll bar - like a child holding a balloon at a fairground. I feel ridiculous. Here goes nothing. Three, two, one... pull.

Nothing happens. In a split-second, I take my eyes off the road and look at the pull-cord. I've pulled it the requisite two inches as briefed. Maybe I broke it? Maybe the parachute's malfunctioned? Should I hit the brake pedal?

In the time it's taken my brain to run through that little sequence of panic, behind me, the Jag has grown a twenty-foot tail. The little ‘drogue 'chute', a sort of sidekick to the main event, is ejected from its heatproof jacket via the spring-loaded release.

It grabs hold of the 135mph headwind, and pulls out the main chute, which releases cleanly from the holster. The whole caboodle tensions, and meanwhile back in the cockpit, I'm trying not to headbutt the steering wheel.

As soon as the ‘thwack' of deceleration has hit, it's over. It's actually a great lesson in how pathetic regular human reaction times are. I am, it turns out, an awfully regular human. As my chest compresses into the belts, I instinctively tense my stomach, take a gulp of air and hold it there, like a boxer expecting a gut punch.

But by the time I've actually sent that signal from brain to lungs, the initial moment of deceleration is long gone, and the Jag is coasting to a steady stop. At 50mph, I jettison the parachute(via another lever pinched from a rally car handbrake) to stop it dragging on the rutted runway. Somewhere along the way, I've remembered to breathe back out. Phew.

The Jag completes in excess of 20 runs during the test day at Bentwaters. Every single time, the parachute release performs faultlessly. The team are understandably chuffed.
The key thing to remember here is that I've experienced around 1G of deceleration for a fraction of a second. I lost about 20mph when the parachute first inflated. That's child's play.

When Bloodhound's parachutes first burst into the desert air at 685mph, Andy Green will be subjected to 3G - equivalent to losing 60mph a second. Imagine driving along in your car at 60mph, then stopping from that speed in just one second.

That's how it'll feel for Andy - and for a hell of a lot longer. Several seconds, in fact. The parachute straps will be handling a 13.5 tonne load. Ouch.

And, when - on the Hakskeen Pan - Bloodhound is stopped at the Turnaround Team at the end of its first run, the chutes will be repacked, the car spun around, and it'll set off to do it all over again.

"We don't know how the car will handle as it decelerates," Green admits. "That's one of the things we're just going to have to find out."

At least this time, he can be confident his parachutes will be on form. With just a little help from TG.

NB: Due to delays with parts manufacture and an impeller bearing failure, Bloodhound has pushed back its tested schedule. The Newquay Airport tests will now take place in November 2015 rather than August, and early desert running won't kick off until spring 2016. As Andy Green explains: "You can't build a 1000mph car with 3000 bespoke components without expecting a few delays. I've been working with the guys on this project for eight years already..."

post from sitemap

June 12, 2015

Ford to return to Le Mans with GT racer

"We're back," explains Bill Ford, executive chairman of the Ford Motor Company. "We're back at Le Mans."

Welcome, then, to the brand new Ford GT race car, set to make its competitive debut next year in both the TUDOR United SportsCar championship and the FIA World Endurance Championship.

Which means it'll be racing at Le Mans, exactly 50 years after the original GT race car completed a 1-2-3 hat-trick finish in the top class at La Sarthe. We'll let that sink in for a moment, because this is incredibly Big News.

This one won't be competing in LMP1, though, but the GTE Pro class - that's the one for production-based racers.

The car itself, as expected, is based heavily on the Ford GT supercar, here packing an iteration of that new, 3.5-litre turbocharged EcoBoost engine co-developed by Roush Yates, and first seen in action in the TUDOR championship last year. We're told it's the most powerful EcoBoost production engine ever.

TG gets an exclusive audience with the new Ford GT

There's a fine suite of aero bits, as you can see, developed to deliver better stability with less drag, and an advanced lightweight composite construction featuring heavy use of carbon fibre, making it lighter and stiffer.

Ford's also embracing the trend for 3D printing, with CEO Mark Field noting that certain components on this car - for example the intake - were created using the technology. Ambitious stuff from a car set to compete at one of the world's most grueling races.

Still, they've got a lot of talent on board to make sure the car runs smoothly. Confirmed partners include Chip Ganassi Racing - who'll run the two Ford teams - Multimatic Motorsports, Roush Yates Engines, Castrol, Michelin, Forza Motorsport, Sparco, Brembo and CGRFS.

And when it comes to Le Mans, the two teams will pair up and field a four-car effort, competing in the GTE Pro class currently dominated by Aston Martin, Ferrari and Porsche. So, no pressure then.

"This vehicle, really from the very beginning, was born to race," explains Bill Ford, speaking at the car's launch at this year's Le Mans 24 hour race. "I cannot wait for next year. To be back at Le Mans with this car and with our partners, couldn't be better..."

post from sitemap

June 11, 2015

Meet Mansory’s new 829bhp G63 6x6

Mansory has tuned the Mercedes-Benz G63 AMG 6x6. Again. If that sentence hasn't sounded off your internal fear klaxon, you might like to know what they've done. Again.

The first time around, the mighty G-Wagen's 5.5-litre twin-turbo V8 was treated to an increase in power - 829 horsepowers and 737lb ft worth of oomph - thanks to new, race-derived pistons, rods, bearings, crankshaft and cylinder head.

Sweet lord, it's the Mansory G63 6x6

For this new version, it has retained the tuned AMG, hand-built V8, and the same 829 horsepowers and many torques. But it gets a new face - specifically, a new set of front skirts, LED daytime running lights and, erm, new lights.

There are four extra headlights fitted on the roof, too, a carbon bonnet with extra air inlets to let those 822 horses breathe, and a heck of a lot more Carbon Things dotted around the vast, 5.9m long, 2.1m wide and 2.2m high body.

Things like the side trim strips, mirror housings, side covers, and even the headlight cladding.

First drive: the Brabus 6x6 takes on London

You can of course, customise the heck out of the interior, with your choice of leather, Alcantara, wood, carbon or aluminium trim elements. If you ask them nicely, they'll probably deck it out using Mars space dust, too.

Prices on request, naturally. But expect it to be north of the limited-edition ‘standard' G63 6x6's £370k.

Also, YELLOW.

Video: Richard Hammond drives the Mercedes G63 6x6

post from sitemap

June 10, 2015

Why the 7-Series is BMW's crystal ball

This is the brand-new BMW 7-Series, the sixth generation of Munich's luxury flagship saloon.

But, more importantly than that, it's a crystal ball for the future of nearly all things BMW. Everything in this car will filter down through the family tree to the 3- and 1-Series, Minis and the rest.

First drive: the new, sixth-generation BMW 7-Series

But let's start with the headlines, which run as thus. The all-new 7-Series features better crash resistance than ever before. It's stiffer. It's lighter. There's lots of carbon fibre and aluminium in the construction. The suspension is new. It'll even park itself.

At its very core, the new 7-Series features a, um, ‘Carbon Core', which uses technology transferred from the i3 supermini and i8 supercar. It's a monocoque formed from carbon fibre reinforced plastic, ultra high-tensile steels and aluminium. Expect this to make its way onto smaller mainstream Beemers.

Thanks to the use of CFRP and aluminium, the new 7-Series is up to 130kg lighter than the model it replaces, weighing as little as 1725kg. That's flyweight by the standards of five-metre-long limos.

With less to hustle around, the 7-Series is faster than ever before. Enter the Big BMW V8. With weight distribution at a perfect 50:50, Munich's twin-turbo 4.4-litre leads the charge as the range-topper, here badged 750i (and 750Li for the long-wheelbase version).

It produces 444bhp, and features turbos fitted in the ‘V' of the cylinder banks, new intake and exhaust manifolds, and a new coolant pump. The 750i, in xDrive form, will accelerate from 0-62mph in 4.4 seconds and top out at a limited 155mph. Not slow.

There's also a 322bhp 3.0-litre straight-six in the 740i - derived from the same family of engines as the Mini and i8 three-pots - that'll manage 0-62mph in 5.5s.

First drive: the new, sixth-generation BMW 7-Series

Want diesel? You're looking at a 3.0-litre straight-six with 261bhp and a handy 457lb ft of torque. That one is badged 730d. Tick the box marked ‘740e' (or 740Le xDrive) and you'll get a hybrid 7-Series.

The petrol-electric 740e gets a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder turbo engine with an electric motor bolted to the auto ‘box, fed from a battery hiding under the rear seats. Combined, they produce 322bhp, with the 740e officially returning 134.5mpg and emitting just 49g/km of CO2. If you drive it on e-power alone, you get 25 miles of range and a 75mph top speed. Not at the same time.

All engines come with an eight-speed auto, and there's new air suspension on board as standard, which adjusts the ride height depending on the mode selected (higher for standard, lower for ‘Sport'), or via a camera which scans the road ahead for, um, smoothness. Or lack thereof.

Inside, it's all business. The new iDrive is a touch-screen (though a rotary knob is still there), and there's the option of gesture control, too, for example controlling the audio, or answering a call.

And, of course, there are plenty of sensors to tell you about traffic and other cars, and plenty of assistance to make sure you don't join them in a tangled mess.

The seats are new (and massaging, if optioned). There's a panorama glass roof (again, if optioned). There's even the option of a ‘remote control parking' mechanism, whereby you can manoeuvre the 7-er into and out of a tight spot from outside the car, using just the key. Superb, right?

Sure, it looks like a conservative refresh of BMW's trademark big saloon design - in some angles like a 3-Series on steroids, no? - and that remote parking is indeed a cool trick. But as TG's Paul Horrell noted on his first drive of a prototype new 7-Series BMW, it's the fundamentals on display that are of note.

Make no mistake, if you like your Bee-Ems, this one matters.

First drive: the new, sixth-generation BMW 7-Series

post from sitemap